Which construction software does Google AI Overviews name?
Procore was named in 21 of 30 Google AI Overviews answers about construction software captured on 22 September 2026; Buildertrend appeared in 15. The table below gives every vendor in the checked set, including those with zero observations. It records which names appeared, without establishing which product fits your project.
What we measured
Measured. The September Index method used ten fixed construction buyer questions and three runs per question. All 30 AI Overviews observations in this category were valid. Procore's 21 of 30 gives 70.0 percent, with a Wilson 95 percent interval of 52.1 to 83.3 percent. The collection was captured on 22 September and released 23 September 2026.
| Checked vendor | Named in valid answers |
|---|---|
| Autodesk Construction Cloud | 8 of 30 |
| Buildertrend | 15 of 30 |
| Buildxact | 4 of 30 |
| CMiC | 3 of 30 |
| ConstructionOnline | 1 of 30 |
| Contractor Foreman | 12 of 30 |
| eSUB | 3 of 30 |
| Fieldwire | 8 of 30 |
| Foundation Software | 1 of 30 |
| InEight | 0 of 30 |
| JobTread | 8 of 30 |
| Jonas Construction | 0 of 30 |
| Kahua | 5 of 30 |
| Leap | 0 of 30 |
| Linarc | 0 of 30 |
| Oracle Construction and Engineering | 0 of 30 |
| Penta Software | 0 of 30 |
| Procore | 21 of 30 |
| Raken | 1 of 30 |
| RedTeam | 0 of 30 |
| Sage 300 CRE | 0 of 30 |
| Trimble Viewpoint | 0 of 30 |
Each cell counts an answer that named the checked vendor under the published matching rule. An answer can name several vendors, so these rows do not divide 30 answers into separate market shares. This table covers AI Overviews alone; the category record also contains other engines.
What this means for you
Reasoned. Start with the construction decision you need to make. A question about a small residential builder and a question about a larger project team can lead to different lists. Find the matching question in the public panel before using the category total to choose what to investigate.
Keep the job requirements beside the names. The naming rule does not test an estimating process, document handoff or project-control requirement. Confirm a particular capability from a suitable product source rather than treating repeated appearance as proof that it works for your project.
- If you buy software: use the question-level observations to assemble a research list, then check your required work and product scope.
- If you publish a construction product page: explain the buyer task and supported capability clearly enough for a reader to verify them.
- If you report visibility: retain the 30-answer AI Overviews base instead of replacing it with the larger multi-engine category base.
A zero in this panel means no recorded naming in these answers. It gives you a dated question to investigate, not a finding that the vendor lacks the product capability.
Also asked as
Which construction software does Google AI Overviews name?
Related
- Construction project management software question panel
- Procore's public record
- Why engines differ
- Inspect a published measurement method
Next step
Choose the construction question that resembles your decision in the Free 10-question check (one engine). No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance. Save its engine and date with the answer you inspect.
For one unclear, source-backed construction product explanation, Fix one answer, $490. Agree the factual change and the served-page check separately from any later engine observation.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
Claiming or correcting a vendor record is free and never depends on a purchase.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: hello@broadcastwell.com