Skip to content

Study 6: Wrong About You

Broadcastwell Research, Study 6, 9 October 2026. CC BY 4.0. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23270124. Data and code: https://github.com/Broadcastwell/wrong-about-you-2026-10.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team

Answers captured under method v1.1 on 22 to 23 Sep 2026 for the Absence Index release 2026-09 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695). Statements were extracted and classified under the published Record rules and checked against each vendor's own public pages. Every flagged statement is published with its engine, run, question, capture date and the vendor page it was checked against. Team review of the flagged statements is in progress; rows change only if the review changes them, and every change is logged in the public ledger.

The findings

  • 5346 answers named the 70 vendors (the five most named in each of 14 categories of the Absence Index release 2026-09).
  • They made 2922 factual statements about those vendors (one claim as stated by one engine): 1924 true, 113 wrong, 5 stale and 880 unverifiable against the vendors' own pages.
  • Wrong or stale among verifiable statements: 118 of 2042 (5.8 percent, 95 percent interval 4.8 to 6.9).
  • Answers carrying at least one wrong or stale statement about the vendor they name: 175 of 5346 (3.3 percent, 95 percent interval 2.8 to 3.8).

Unverifiable counts as neither right nor wrong. Counts come before rates; every rate carries a 95 percent Wilson interval, descriptive because statements from one answer or one engine are not independent.

Per engine

Engine Statements True Wrong Stale Unverifiable Wrong or stale among verifiable
ChatGPT 647 575 0 0 72 0 of 575 (0.0 percent, 95 percent interval 0.0 to 0.7)
Claude 1177 605 77 2 493 79 of 684 (11.5 percent, 95 percent interval 9.4 to 14.2)
Perplexity 150 113 4 0 33 4 of 117 (3.4 percent, 95 percent interval 1.3 to 8.5)
Google AI Overviews 496 316 25 2 153 27 of 343 (7.9 percent, 95 percent interval 5.5 to 11.2)
Google AI Mode 452 315 7 1 129 8 of 323 (2.5 percent, 95 percent interval 1.3 to 4.8)

Per category

Category Statements True Wrong Stale Unverifiable Wrong or stale among verifiable
Construction project management software 217 138 9 0 70 9 of 147 (6.1 percent, 95 percent interval 3.3 to 11.2)
Dealership management systems 272 184 11 0 77 11 of 195 (5.6 percent, 95 percent interval 3.2 to 9.8)
Dental practice management software 221 145 13 4 59 17 of 162 (10.5 percent, 95 percent interval 6.7 to 16.2)
Field service management software 241 166 5 0 70 5 of 171 (2.9 percent, 95 percent interval 1.3 to 6.7)
Hotel property management software 153 119 2 0 32 2 of 121 (1.7 percent, 95 percent interval 0.5 to 5.8)
Insurance agency management systems 244 139 6 0 99 6 of 145 (4.1 percent, 95 percent interval 1.9 to 8.7)
Legal practice management software 300 149 34 0 117 34 of 183 (18.6 percent, 95 percent interval 13.6 to 24.8)
Loan origination and lending software 111 69 0 1 41 1 of 70 (1.4 percent, 95 percent interval 0.3 to 7.7)
Radiology and medical imaging software 146 110 0 0 36 0 of 110 (0.0 percent, 95 percent interval 0.0 to 3.4)
Residential property management software 377 261 15 0 101 15 of 276 (5.4 percent, 95 percent interval 3.3 to 8.8)
Transportation management systems 159 106 4 0 49 4 of 110 (3.6 percent, 95 percent interval 1.4 to 9.0)
Veterinary practice management software 247 164 7 0 76 7 of 171 (4.1 percent, 95 percent interval 2.0 to 8.2)
CRM 192 136 6 0 50 6 of 142 (4.2 percent, 95 percent interval 2.0 to 8.9)
Project management 42 38 1 0 3 1 of 39 (2.6 percent, 95 percent interval 0.5 to 13.2)

What kind of statement

Type Statements True Wrong Stale Unverifiable
pricing 1034 539 76 4 415
plans 388 274 9 0 105
free tier 90 61 8 0 21
founding 32 20 2 0 10
ownership 72 62 3 0 7
headquarters 3 2 0 0 1
product names 395 289 4 1 101
integrations 391 292 2 0 97
platforms 435 348 7 0 80
certifications 12 7 0 0 5
customer counts 44 20 2 0 22
acquisitions 23 8 0 0 15
discontinued 3 2 0 0 1

Where the wrong and stale statements came from

Causing page Claims
own page 1
directory 3
review site 3
press 0
forum 0
other 43
cause not found 50

How sure: in how many of the three runs the engine said it

Stated in True Wrong Stale Unverifiable
1 of 3 runs 714 71 3 483
2 of 3 runs 420 16 2 213
3 of 3 runs 790 26 0 184

Every vendor, with its category median

Category Vendor Answers Wrong (median) Stale (median) Unverifiable (median) True (median) Review
Construction project management software Procore 109 2 (2) 0 (0) 17 (2) 38 (29) Team review: in progress
Construction project management software Buildertrend 83 0 (2) 0 (0) 50 (2) 15 (29) No flagged statements
Construction project management software Contractor Foreman 77 3 (2) 0 (0) 0 (2) 29 (29) Team review: in progress
Construction project management software Fieldwire 57 0 (2) 0 (0) 2 (2) 31 (29) No flagged statements
Construction project management software JobTread 50 4 (2) 0 (0) 1 (2) 25 (29) Team review: in progress
Dealership management systems CDK Global 90 0 (2) 0 (0) 35 (11) 15 (32) No flagged statements
Dealership management systems DealerCenter 79 2 (2) 0 (0) 11 (11) 67 (32) Team review: in progress
Dealership management systems Tekion 76 2 (2) 0 (0) 10 (11) 32 (32) Team review: in progress
Dealership management systems Dealertrack 67 0 (2) 0 (0) 13 (11) 28 (32) No flagged statements
Dealership management systems Frazer 59 7 (2) 0 (0) 8 (11) 42 (32) Team review: in progress
Dental practice management software Dentrix 120 1 (1) 0 (0) 24 (10) 25 (24) Team review: in progress
Dental practice management software Open Dental 118 8 (1) 4 (0) 8 (10) 57 (24) Team review: in progress
Dental practice management software Curve Dental 115 1 (1) 0 (0) 10 (10) 16 (24) Team review: in progress
Dental practice management software Dentrix Ascend 97 2 (1) 0 (0) 1 (10) 23 (24) Team review: in progress
Dental practice management software Eaglesoft 69 1 (1) 0 (0) 16 (10) 24 (24) Team review: in progress
Field service management software Housecall Pro 108 0 (1) 0 (0) 10 (10) 69 (29) No flagged statements
Field service management software ServiceTitan 102 0 (1) 0 (0) 31 (10) 30 (29) No flagged statements
Field service management software Workiz 58 2 (1) 0 (0) 15 (10) 20 (29) Team review: in progress
Field service management software FieldPulse 57 1 (1) 0 (0) 4 (10) 18 (29) Team review: in progress
Field service management software Jobber 50 2 (1) 0 (0) 10 (10) 29 (29) Team review: in progress
Hotel property management software Cloudbeds 115 1 (0) 0 (0) 8 (7) 31 (26) Team review: in progress
Hotel property management software Stayntouch 68 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (7) 17 (26) No flagged statements
Hotel property management software Little Hotelier 51 1 (0) 0 (0) 7 (7) 19 (26) Team review: in progress
Hotel property management software Mews 48 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (7) 26 (26) No flagged statements
Hotel property management software Maestro PMS 43 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (7) 26 (26) No flagged statements
Insurance agency management systems Applied Systems 127 0 (1) 0 (0) 21 (21) 13 (22) No flagged statements
Insurance agency management systems EZLynx 111 1 (1) 0 (0) 34 (21) 29 (22) Team review: in progress
Insurance agency management systems HawkSoft 97 3 (1) 0 (0) 13 (21) 54 (22) Team review: in progress
Insurance agency management systems Vertafore 92 1 (1) 0 (0) 23 (21) 22 (22) Team review: in progress
Insurance agency management systems NowCerts 48 1 (1) 0 (0) 8 (21) 21 (22) Team review: in progress
Legal practice management software Clio 126 1 (7) 0 (0) 94 (7) 46 (21) Team review: in progress
Legal practice management software 8am MyCase 96 11 (7) 0 (0) 7 (7) 49 (21) Team review: in progress
Legal practice management software CosmoLex 77 14 (7) 0 (0) 3 (7) 21 (21) Team review: in progress
Legal practice management software PracticePanther 76 7 (7) 0 (0) 6 (7) 21 (21) Team review: in progress
Legal practice management software Filevine 74 1 (7) 0 (0) 7 (7) 12 (21) Team review: in progress
Loan origination and lending software nCino 92 0 (0) 0 (0) 12 (8) 21 (8) No flagged statements
Loan origination and lending software MeridianLink 81 0 (0) 0 (0) 8 (8) 28 (8) No flagged statements
Loan origination and lending software ICE Mortgage Technology 62 0 (0) 1 (0) 15 (8) 7 (8) Team review: in progress
Loan origination and lending software Abrigo 50 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (8) 8 (8) No flagged statements
Loan origination and lending software Baker Hill 36 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (8) 5 (8) No flagged statements
Radiology and medical imaging software Sectra 87 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (7) 19 (24) No flagged statements
Radiology and medical imaging software Intelerad 80 0 (0) 0 (0) 12 (7) 24 (24) No flagged statements
Radiology and medical imaging software Visage Imaging 65 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (7) 25 (24) No flagged statements
Radiology and medical imaging software Fujifilm (Synapse) 51 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (7) 18 (24) No flagged statements
Radiology and medical imaging software RamSoft 46 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (7) 24 (24) No flagged statements
Residential property management software Buildium 119 3 (3) 0 (0) 47 (11) 88 (52) Team review: in progress
Residential property management software AppFolio 95 1 (3) 0 (0) 36 (11) 52 (52) Team review: in progress
Residential property management software DoorLoop 77 6 (3) 0 (0) 7 (11) 32 (52) Team review: in progress
Residential property management software Yardi 71 3 (3) 0 (0) 11 (11) 72 (52) Team review: in progress
Residential property management software Innago 41 2 (3) 0 (0) 0 (11) 17 (52) Team review: in progress
Transportation management systems AscendTMS 64 0 (0) 0 (0) 13 (11) 59 (10) No flagged statements
Transportation management systems Alvys 58 1 (0) 0 (0) 17 (11) 35 (10) Team review: in progress
Transportation management systems Oracle Transportation Management 43 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (11) 2 (10) No flagged statements
Transportation management systems Tai TMS 39 3 (0) 0 (0) 2 (11) 10 (10) Team review: in progress
Transportation management systems SAP Transportation Management 38 0 (0) 0 (0) 11 (11) 0 (10) No flagged statements
Veterinary practice management software ezyVet 115 2 (2) 0 (0) 17 (17) 37 (34) Team review: in progress
Veterinary practice management software IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) 90 1 (2) 0 (0) 24 (17) 39 (34) Team review: in progress
Veterinary practice management software Digitail 67 0 (2) 0 (0) 13 (17) 34 (34) No flagged statements
Veterinary practice management software DaySmart Vet 57 2 (2) 0 (0) 4 (17) 20 (34) Team review: in progress
Veterinary practice management software Shepherd 56 2 (2) 0 (0) 18 (17) 34 (34) Team review: in progress
CRM HubSpot CRM 113 2 (1) 0 (0) 14 (11) 31 (29) Team review: in progress
CRM Salesforce Sales Cloud 109 2 (1) 0 (0) 14 (11) 29 (29) Team review: in progress
CRM Pipedrive 97 1 (1) 0 (0) 11 (11) 22 (29) Team review: in progress
CRM Zoho CRM 73 0 (1) 0 (0) 5 (11) 31 (29) No flagged statements
CRM Microsoft Dynamics 365 36 1 (1) 0 (0) 6 (11) 23 (29) Team review: in progress
Project management Asana 97 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1) 8 (8) Team review: in progress
Project management ClickUp 80 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1) 6 (8) No flagged statements
Project management Jira 63 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 9 (8) No flagged statements
Project management Wrike 54 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 7 (8) No flagged statements
Project management Smartsheet 54 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 8 (8) No flagged statements

Method

Answers. Every valid target answer in the Absence Index release 2026-09 that names one of the 70 vendors under the release's own matching rule; their number equals each vendor's published named count. Five engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode), ten buyer questions per category, three scheduled runs, captured under method v1.1 on 22 to 23 Sep 2026 for the Absence Index release 2026-09 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695). No new answer was captured for this study.

Statements and classes. Thirteen statement types: pricing, plans, free tier, founding, ownership, headquarters, product names, integrations, platforms, certifications, customer counts, acquisitions and discontinued products. Each claim is classed true, wrong, stale or unverifiable under the published Record rules (broadcastwell.com/methodology#record-rules) against the vendor's own pages read once on 8 October 2026, with a verbatim quote from the page for every true, wrong or stale claim. A script checks every quote against the deposit and the page read. Every row shows its actual review state. Only a statement signed by two distinct analysts with a real date may show the verified mark. Review changes are logged in data/review_log.csv; source provenance corrections are logged in data/provenance_log.csv.

Causes and confidence. A wrong or stale claim's causing page is a page cited by the answers carrying it that carries the statement, typed own page, directory, review site, press, forum or other; otherwise "cause not found". Confidence is the number of the three runs in which the engine stated the claim.

Differences from the Record Check. The Record Check captures fresh answers by hand and a reviewer classes them. This study reuses the September answers, traces causes through the answers' own citations only, and reads the vendors' pages on 8 October 2026. A page whose robots.txt disallows automated agents was not read; its claims stay unverifiable.

What this does not prove

Wrong About You records what five AI engines stated about 70 vendors in answer to buyer questions on stated dates, classed against each vendor's own published facts. It makes no claim about what any buyer was told or decided. "Wrong" means the statement contradicted the vendor's published fact on the capture date; "stale" means it was true before a documented change; "unverifiable" means the vendor's own pages did not settle it. A causing page is the page that carried the statement, not proof that the engine read it. The vendors are the subjects of the engines' statements, not their authors; a wrong statement about a vendor says nothing about the vendor's product.

Disputes and citation

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Cite as: Broadcastwell (2026). Wrong About You: what five AI engines state about 70 software vendors (Version 1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23270124. All versions: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23270123.

The Record Check

Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Broadcastwell ran this study and sells the Record Check for one company, $490. Get the Record Check. The study data, classifications and code are public. Correction Desk.

Download the PDF

Measure it for your own category

The Category Audit: one category, ten buyer questions, five engines, three measured runs, $490 once. Findings within 48 hours of your category confirmation. Refundable in full within 30 days of delivery.

Get the Category Audit, $490

Results appear in your account; a sign-in link arrives by email. Sign in or create a free account.

The $490 credits once against the $2,900 Fix Sprint within 30 days of delivery, so the Sprint is $2,410.

Free 10 question check (one engine)

See the terms for credits and refunds.