Which hotel management software does Google AI Mode name?
Google AI Mode named Mews in 8 of 30 hotel software answers captured on 22 September 2026. In the same panel, Cloudbeds appeared in 23 and Stayntouch in 14. The alphabetical table keeps all checked hotel vendors visible, including names that did not appear.
What we measured
Measured. The hotel property-management panel used ten fixed buyer questions and three runs per question under the September method. AI Mode retained 30 valid observations. Mews's 8 of 30 is 26.7 percent, with a Wilson 95 percent interval of 14.2 to 44.4 percent. The answers were captured 22 September 2026 and published in the 23 September release.
| Checked vendor | Named in valid answers |
|---|---|
| Amadeus Hospitality (iHotelier) | 0 of 30 |
| Apaleo | 3 of 30 |
| Aven Hospitality (SynXis) | 1 of 30 |
| Clock PMS+ | 0 of 30 |
| Cloudbeds | 23 of 30 |
| eviivo | 0 of 30 |
| Guestline | 0 of 30 |
| Hotelogix | 1 of 30 |
| HotelTime Solutions | 1 of 30 |
| innRoad | 0 of 30 |
| Little Hotelier | 9 of 30 |
| Maestro PMS | 9 of 30 |
| Mews | 8 of 30 |
| Oracle OPERA Cloud | 2 of 30 |
| Planet protel | 0 of 30 |
| ResNexus | 0 of 30 |
| RMS Cloud | 9 of 30 |
| RoomKeyPMS | 3 of 30 |
| roommaster | 5 of 30 |
| RoomRaccoon | 2 of 30 |
| Stayntouch | 14 of 30 |
| ThinkReservations | 3 of 30 |
| Visual Matrix | 0 of 30 |
| WebRezPro | 0 of 30 |
| Yanolja Cloud Solution (eZee) | 0 of 30 |
A count belongs to the checked vendor label and this engine's answer base. Multiple vendors may be named in one answer, so adding the rows does not produce a count of different buyers or hotel purchases. The panel is a defined sample rather than an inventory of every hotel system.
What this means for you
Reasoned. Identify the hotel context in the question before using a naming count. A small independent hotel and another type of operation can pose different buying questions. Read the relevant question record, then check which observed names belong in your own research list.
Use current product evidence for the next stage. A naming observation does not verify a booking connection, a property requirement or a price. Keep those claims and their sources separate from the dated observation that led you to inspect the supplier.
- If you operate a hotel: write down the property need before comparing the products whose names you found.
- If you publish hotel software information: make the product scope and required connections clear in supported statements.
- If you present a visibility report: retain the engine and date, and show the eight observations with their 30-answer base instead of presenting a percentage alone.
Do not read a zero as proof that a product is unavailable or unsuitable for your property. It means that the matching rule recorded no naming for that checked label in these particular AI Mode answers.
Also asked as
Which hotel management software does Google AI Mode name?
Related
- Hotel property management software question panel
- Mews's public record
- Why engines differ
- Inspect a published measurement method
Next step
Use the hotel question that matches your buying context in the Free 10-question check (one engine). No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance. Save its engine and date with the answer you inspect.
For one unclear hotel-product statement with supporting evidence, Fix one answer, $490. Agree the factual change and the served-page check separately from any later engine observation.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
Claiming or correcting a vendor record is free and never depends on a purchase.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: hello@broadcastwell.com