Which sources do AI answers cite for field service software?
For a field service source check, start with the recorded page behind the claim: fieldpulse.com and fieldservicesoftware.io each appeared in 52 of 150 valid answer source lists captured on 22 September 2026. getjobber.com appeared in 49. The category contains 155 distinct domains, and these pooled counts do not show which source an individual engine relied on.
What we measured
Measured. The published field service records combine ten questions, three observations and ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. All 150 scheduled answers were valid. This alphabetical sample shows source hosts, with each domain counted no more than once in a given answer.
| Recorded domain | Appeared in source lists |
|---|---|
| fieldpulse.com | 52 of 150 |
| fieldservicesoftware.io | 52 of 150 |
| getjobber.com | 49 of 150 |
| housecallpro.com | 43 of 150 |
| servicetitan.com | 36 of 150 |
| youtube.com | 33 of 150 |
For fieldpulse.com, 52 of 150 is 34.7 percent, with a descriptive 95 percent Wilson interval of 27.5 to 42.6 percent. A source-list occurrence does not verify its content or prove that it caused a product recommendation. The release date is 23 September 2026.
These figures are not engine-specific own-domain citation rates. The category's domain lists can include several hosts in the same answer and do not establish the passage supporting every product statement.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
What this means for you
Reasoned. Match the source investigation to the work. A growing plumbing business with about ten technicians, a small HVAC company and a commercial fire-protection contractor appear as different buyer contexts. Take the citation attached to the relevant answer instead of treating a frequently observed host as useful for every field-service requirement.
Read the exact product boundary in the passage. Does it concern the named supplier's product, another offering, a comparison or a general category? Compare the answer's claim about a connection or function with what that passage actually supports. Retain the date and destination URL so another reader can repeat the check.
If you publish the result, keep the host count next to its 150-answer base and the capture date. Do not call the two hosts with 52 appearances market leaders, equal influences or equal-quality sources. For a vendor seeking a factual correction, the important material is the supported statement and readable documentation. The study did not test whether obtaining another third-party mention changes an AI answer.
Also asked as
Which sources do AI answers cite for field service software?
Related
- Published category and question records
- What the engines actually cite
- Read the answer and its evidence
- Investigate an observed absence
Next step
With Free 10-question check (one engine), follow one field-service product statement to its cited page and preserve the passage you used to check it. No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.
If the comparison shows one factual mismatch backed by a dated source, Fix one answer, $490 can address it. Keep any later naming or citation observation as a separate result.
Claiming or correcting a vendor record is free and never depends on a purchase.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Ananya Rao, AI Engineer. Corrections: hello@broadcastwell.com