How should the report show visits?
If you are reporting visits, state the reporting period, what counted as a visit and the source evidence received. Our 22 September 2026 Index recorded Procore naming alongside an own-domain citation in 30 of 150 construction-software answers. That figure belongs to an answer-observation row; it cannot supply the visit count or visit definition in a traffic report.
What we measured
Measured. The original construction CSV and release combine ten buyer questions, three returns and five engines. Procore's concurrent naming-and-own-domain-citation count uses a base of 150 answers. Its recorded own-domain sources include procore.com and learn.procore.com. This count contains no visitor or session record.
Reported. The AI Source Standard's visits section asks for the period and visit definition, separate source labels and buyer self-reports, and disclosure of changes affecting period comparisons. Google's AI features guide, read on 29 October 2026, says traffic from its AI features is included in Search Console's overall Web search reporting.
Reasoned. A report can show the dated Procore citation observation as context, while the visit row remains tied to its own traffic record and the scope of the tool reporting it.
What this means for you
Label that column Web. For Google's search figures, the published Web reporting scope matters when someone asks for an AI-only visit total. A Web total containing AI-feature traffic is not automatically an isolated Mode or Overview count. The Procore source rows offer a parallel unit check: two named own-domain hosts can occur in the evidence, while the published numerator still counts answers rather than URL requests.
Also asked as
How should the report show visits?
Related
- AI Source Standard visit reporting
- The construction category data
- Original Index data and definitions
- Google AI search reporting scope
- The Manual chapter on valid measurement
Next step
Use the Free 10-question check (one engine) for a separate dated company-answer sample. No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.
For one documented company-fact error, Fix one answer, $490. Keep the retained answer and its supporting public source with the correction.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: hello@broadcastwell.com