What information belongs in a public report?
Publish reviewed aggregates and authorised evidence, with the date, base and source needed to check the claim. The permissions criterion in our insurance buyer-language study has a 10/150 answer count, using the 22 September 2026 capture. That public count can be reported; it does not turn private customer records, deal notes or unreviewed text into material you may publish.
What we measured
Measured. The study method identifies answer-level buying criteria in the September panel. The insurance permissions criterion has ten linked answer records from an eligible base of 150. The frequency interval is 3.7% to 11.8%, and the published team-review status remains in progress.
Seven records retain quotation text. Three retain offsets without a quotation in the published text field. The coding count remains ten; a report should not describe those rows as ten visible quotations. Nor should the answer-level percentage become a percentage of insurance buyers requesting that feature.
Reported. Our public-report section of the AI Source Standard calls for reviewed aggregates and authorised evidence. It excludes private customer identities, deal details and unreviewed free text from a public source report.
Reasoned. The criterion can illustrate how a published research aggregate is checked. It does not establish legal permission to release anyone’s customer material.
What this means for you
For this insurance example, a useful public row identifies the criterion, 150-answer base, 10 coded records, capture date, interval and review status. A reader can then follow the study receipt rather than being asked to trust a screenshot of an unexplained percentage. Keep the quotation limitation alongside the count.
Before releasing a chart, read the chart title and its table together. “Permissions criterion in insurance answers” describes this study. “Insurance buyers demand permissions” would claim a surveyed human population that was never collected.
Also asked as
What information belongs in a public report?
Related
Next step
Use the Free 10-question check (one engine) for a separate dated company-answer sample. No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.
For one sourced company-fact error, Fix one answer, $490. Keep the original answer and its supporting public document together.
Our answer-study method, v1.1.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: hello@broadcastwell.com